Kesulitan belajar dalam bingkai teori Piaget pada siswa SMP usia 13–15 tahun: Systematic literature review

Learning difficulties within the framework of Piaget’s theory among junior high school students aged 13–15 years: A systematic literature review

Authors

  • Zhia Ajrin Mulya Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia
  • Indriani Kristanti Kurnia Putri Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia
  • Sitti Chadjijah Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70757/kharismatik.v3i2.100

Keywords:

cognitive development, learning difficulties, Piagetian theory

Abstract

This systematic literature review addresses the crucial challenge of identifying learning difficulties among junior high school students aged 13-15 through the lens of Piaget's cognitive development theory. The study aims to analyze manifestations of learning difficulties, identify inhibiting factors, and formulate effective intervention strategies based on Piagetian principles. Using the PRISMA 2020 guideline, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of empirical studies from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and other academic databases published between 2005-2025. The results reveal consistent patterns of learning difficulties characterized by dependency on concrete representations, limited abstract reasoning capabilities, and cognitive regression phenomena across mathematics and science subjects. Furthermore, the study identifies significant discrepancies between instructional methods and students' cognitive stages as primary contributing factors. The research concludes by proposing a diagnostic matrix prototype that bridges theoretical Piagetian constructs with practical classroom applications. The findings emphasize the urgent need for cognitive stage-appropriate teaching strategies and have substantial implications for curriculum development, teacher training programs, and educational policy formulation in basic education.

References

Adeduyigbe, A. M., & Okeke, U. K. (2025). Instructional design considerations: Cognitive development and physics comprehension in secondary education. International Journal of Studies in Psychology, 5(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v5i1.1598

Adeoye, I. F. (2020). Chemistry Students’ Cognitive Operations and Achievement in Conceptual and Computational Knowledge in Inquiry-based Instructions. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2020/v9/i7/JUL20014

Aeni, N., Budiamin, A., & Muhtar, F. (2023). Implementation of Learning Theory of Constructivism Perspective Jean Piaget (1896-1980) in PAI Learning at SDI Bilal Bin Robah Batulayar Village, Batulayar District. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 5219–5229. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.7163

Anderman, E. M., Ormrod, J. E., & Anderman, L. H. (2024). Educational psychology: Developing learners (Eleventh edition). Pearson.

Anggraeni, N. D., Kumala Dwi Alviana, W., Fitriya Wahyuni, D., Kusuma Ainurrosyidah, L. D., Mahardika, I. K., Sutarto, S., & Wicaksono, I. (2024). Analisis Perkembangan Peserta Didik Menurut Teori Jean Piaget Dan Pengimplementasianya Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Smp. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi, 11(3), 1503–1519. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v11i3.1252

Babai, R. (2010). Piagetian Cognitive Level And The Tendency To Use Intuitive Rules When Solving Comparison Tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9170-2

Basannang, S. M., Darmayanti, N., & Lestari, T. (2024). The Effect Of Operational Audit And Internal Control On Performance. Journal of Economic and Economic Policy, 1(4), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.61796/ijecep.v1i4.48

Borich, G. D. (2013). Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice. Pearson Education Canada. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=XSGjnQEACAAJ

Borich, G. D., & Martin, D. B. (1999). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. Merrill. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=eZ4yQAAACAAJ

Carvalho, A. D. S. M. D., Amorim, V. C. P. D., Silva, D. D. A., Altoe, J. D., Cellin, J., Kaminski, J. S. C., Gois, A. M., & Melanias, P. R. P. (2023). The construction of knowledge from Piaget’s perspective. In UNITING KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT (1st edn). Seven Editora. https://doi.org/10.56238/uniknowindevolp-019

Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2015). Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms. Pearson. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ydtLjgEACAAJ

Güven, U., Karaçam, S., & Sezer, B. B. (2022). Factors Affecting Course Attendance In Distance Education. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 12(4), 1962–1977. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1065288

Halid, L. I. (2024). Constructivist Approach to Language Learning: Linking Piaget’s Theory to Modern Educational Practice. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 11(2), 306–327. https://doi.org/10.36232/interactionjournal.v11i2.33

Hoy, A. W., & Usher, E. L. (2024). Educational psychology (Active learning edition. Fifteenth edition. Rental edition). Pearson.

Jadidah, I. T., Annisah, R., Melinda, M., Padiman, P., & Anggilin, K. (2023). Analysis of the Implications of Learning Elementary Mathematics According to Jean Piaget’s Theory. Journal Of Dehasen Educational Review, 4(02), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.33258/joder.v4i02.4256

Kamila, N. G., Nindiasari, H., Rizky, E., Mita, M., R, N. F., & Makarim, N. (2022). Analisis Tahap Perkembangan Kognitif Matematika Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Negeri 1 Citeureup Dengan Instrumen Test Of Logical Operations (Tlo). Wilangan: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.56704/jirpm.v3i3.13334

Kieffer, M. J., Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Logan, J. K. (2021). Executive functions and English reading comprehension growth in Spanish-English bilingual adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101238

Kosasih, N. Z., Supratman, S., & Hermanto, R. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Pada Materi Aljabar Berdasarkan Teori Jean Piaget. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi.

Kuther, T. L. (2022). Lifespan Development: Lives in Context. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=R29KEAAAQBAJ

Martínez-González, F. E., Macías-Brambila, H., Rodríguez-Jiménez, L. M., & López-Laguna, A. B. (2024). Per-Q as an intervention project in virtual education for virtual learning environments. Revista de Educación Básica. https://doi.org/10.35429/jbe.2024.8.19.1.11

Maurya, R., & Khan, F. (2021). Cognitive Development in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Piaget’s Cognitive Developmental Approach. Mind and Society, 10(03–04), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-103-420224

Mulya, Z. A., Putri, I. K. K., Chadjijah, S., & Hariyanto, T. (2024). Strategi Inovatif Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP: Perspektif Kognitif Piaget. Kharismatik : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.70757/kharismatik.v2i2.94

Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2012). Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DQ0KAAAAQBAJ

Putri, I. E., & Abrianto, D. (2024). Metode Pembelajaran Dalam Pengelolaan Kelas Berbasis Karakter Plegmatis Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK). G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 9(2), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.31316/g-couns.v9i2.6131

Qodariah, L., & Aditya, A. (2025). Media Digital Monopoli untuk Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Sejarah Kelas X di SMA Negeri 19 Bekasi. Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan Dan Inovator Pendidikan, 11(3), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v11i3.30730

Ratni, N. P. (2024). Digital Empowerment in English Language Teaching (Perspective of Jean Piaget-Learning Theory). Proceedings of International Conference on Education, 2(1), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.32672/pice.v2i1.1381

Sadiyah, Sista Liana, & Mufaro’ah. (2024). Studi Tentang Kesulitan Fokus Anak dalam Pembelajaran: Tinjauan Psikologis dan Edukatif. PIJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 3(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.58540/pijar.v3i1.646

Santrock, J. W., & Roehrig, A. D. (2024). Educational psychology (Eighth edition. International student edition). McGraw Hill.

Schunk, D. H. (2013). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Education. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Aq2pBwAAQBAJ

Shukri, A. R. M., & Toran, H. (2025). Jean Piaget Cognitive Learning Theory and Student Teaching Strategies with Special Education Needs. Special Education [SE], 3(1), e0033. https://doi.org/10.59055/se.v3i1.41

Slavin, R. E. (2021). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Pearson. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=tEJY0QEACAAJ

Sternberg, R. (2005). Cognitive Psychology. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=WNss-44HFUQC

Turner, M., & Holdsworth, S. (2023). Developing resilience: Examining the protective factors of early career construction professionals. Construction Management and Economics, 41(10), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2208238

Živković-Rančić, Ž., & Todorović, J. (2022). Parenting styles as predictors of formal operational thinking in adolescents. Nastava i Vaspitanje, 71(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2202199Z

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Mulya, Z. A., Kurnia Putri, I. K., & Chadjijah, S. (2025). Kesulitan belajar dalam bingkai teori Piaget pada siswa SMP usia 13–15 tahun: Systematic literature review: Learning difficulties within the framework of Piaget’s theory among junior high school students aged 13–15 years: A systematic literature review. Kharismatik : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.70757/kharismatik.v3i2.100

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)